posted on 23 Feb 2011, 09:55 1 1. MechaFatigue (Posts: 7; Member since: 13 Jan 2011) Intel was maybe a giant in desktop CPU technology and market. but a little left behind in the mobile chipset race. same way as Microsoft in mobile OS race that been lead by Google's Android. love to see this. posted on 23 Feb 2011, 14:02 0 2. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010) +1. Intel has a lot of ground to make up. The handset manufacturers have already made significant investment in their respective chipset selections. If Intel thinks the handset manufacturers are going to dump their current chipset selections in favor of Intel products absent a compelling reason, they are deluding themselves. … [Read more...] about Comments for : Intel’s Medfield mobile chipset fast-tracked to appear in devices Q3 of this year
Fast track microsoft
An analyst claims that due to RIM's not so good showing in the past months (or a year), Microsoft may look into the possibility of acquiring the Canadian company to boost its own presence in the smartphone market.It's hard to argue that RIM is losing its smartphone momentum - not only this notion is now treated as a common sense thing, but also there is some very persuasive evidence pointing in that direction - its profits and revenue are plunging, people in the mobile industry seem to agree that Windows Phone is sure to overcome BlackBerry OS in the coming years, not to mention that Mike Lazaridis, RIM's co-CEO, doesn't act like a man who is able to turn around the Canadian company's failing fortunes.Its BlackBerry World announcements - the new BlackBerry OS 7.0 (previously known as BB OS 6.1) and its two new handsets - did little to dispel the fears that RIM is lagging behind the smartphone curve. That's only iterated by the fact that Steve Ballmer's appearance during BB World fueled … [Read more...] about Microsoft to buy RIM?
posted on 06 Feb 2016, 13:44 1 1. garciano (unregistered) make no sense that the only the only thing different between the two is screen size, the XL should be a true upgrade to the 650! is PA getting bad info? posted on 06 Feb 2016, 13:52 2 3. kefalin (Posts: 289; Member since: 08 Feb 2015) You make no sense. Lumia 640 and 640 XL are exactly same devices,only difference is camera and screen size,nothing more. posted on 06 Feb 2016, 16:46 1 7. garciano (unregistered) uh does it mention camera or battery? are you a Microsoft rep? 10. kefalin (Posts: 289; Member since: 08 Feb 2015) I meant difference between 640 and 640 XL,not 650 and 650 XL. Yes,but indeed battery is bigger with bigger model. posted on 07 Feb 2016, 01:52 1 9. Tanujtiwari (Posts: 84; Member since: 18 Mar 2015) Someone. Please tell Microsoft to innovate. Such bland, plain, sedentary design will get them nowhere. This, combined with an OS which does look good but stands nowhere near … [Read more...] about Comments for : Microsoft Lumia 850 replaced by the Microsoft Lumia 650 XL?
posted on 10 Apr 2014, 14:06 5 1. NokiaFTW (Posts: 2072; Member since: 24 Oct 2012) I might pick this up! posted on 10 Apr 2014, 14:21 3 2. smguk (Posts: 36; Member since: 18 Mar 2014) Nice but i am happy with my Surface 2 posted on 10 Apr 2014, 14:38 0 3. vincelongman (Posts: 5283; Member since: 10 Feb 2013) MS should make a 13" or 12" version as well to compete against ultrabooks posted on 10 Apr 2014, 14:41 1 4. Finalflash (Posts: 3712; Member since: 23 Jul 2013) Yea unfortunately, they have all these examples of what should be out RIGHT NOW and they seem to want to make it over the next 3 years. They apparently have no intention of catching up. They have to put in the extra muscle and push through to level NOW or they will fall further and further behind. So yea, look forward to picking it up in 3 more years. posted on 10 Apr 2014, 15:07 0 5. xche78x (Posts: 101; Member since: 11 Mar 2014) make it 8 inches, haswell ulv (dual core … [Read more...] about Comments for : Microsoft is rumored again to be working on the Surface mini
posted on 05 Apr 2015, 03:19 1 1. vincelongman (Posts: 5283; Member since: 10 Feb 2013) I suspect its because MS is waiting for Intel's Skylake Core M and U processers posted on 08 Apr 2015, 21:08 0 12. deuel18 (Posts: 41; Member since: 28 Dec 2012) I hate the Core M too. But at the same time, I'm hoping that the skylake will be out this year. Specially for the desktop and mobile i-family posted on 05 Apr 2015, 04:16 5 2. faptastic (Posts: 65; Member since: 19 Aug 2014) How much new stuff is there to warrant a Surface pro 4 anyway? The pro 3 is already lonely at the top. As long as there's no valuable new tech that warrants an upgrade, why bother? I can only see USB-C as possible addition, but that doesn't seem like a killer feature just quite yet. And since apple isn't putting out any competition either. Their core m macbook is inferior in every way and quite a lot more expensive. posted on 05 Apr 2015, 05:03 5 4. brrunopt (Posts: 742; Member since: 15 … [Read more...] about Comments for : Successor to Microsoft Surface Pro 3 may not land until October